On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Grant, > > > > Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible > > property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a > > more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about > > the flexcan implementations. > > If there is no ip core version, then just stick with the > fsl,<soc>-flexcan name and drop "fsl,flexcan". Marketing may say > flexcan is flexcan, but hardware engineers like to change things. > Trying to be too generic in compatible values will just lead to > problems in the future.
Thanks, Robin _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
