Yeah, that's my only suggestion really - I've had quite a few problems before where I had very dense particles being culled by complex geo and on random frames you'd get very distinct cubes where the volume calculations have freaked out. Never found a particularly useful workaround, I'm afraid.
Simplifying the geo has helped, sometimes not grouping them together and doing several tests on individual parts did. But sometimes that just shifts the problem to different frames - for the project I was on we had one of those unfortunate 'just do it in Houdini' moments. Good luck! :) On 7 May 2013 20:29, Eric Thivierge <ethivie...@hybride.com> wrote: > Not necessarily cubes. If I run a smooth op on the geo it fixes much of > it (although this is not a solution for me) so it's got to be the internal > methods not liking something about the geometry. > > > Eric Thivierge > =============== > Character TD / RnD > Hybride Technologies > > > On 07/05/2013 3:26 PM, Peter Agg wrote: > > Is this the thing where you get giant cubes of bad volume data, or > something else? > > > On 7 May 2013 19:54, Eric Thivierge <ethivie...@hybride.com> wrote: > >> Anyone notice how many times this just doesn't work correctly? Even >> toggling the Closed volume inside often doesn't give the correct results as >> well... >> >> I have a voxel setup with particles and testing inside a geometry to keep >> the ones that are within, works, however there are many points still >> outside the geo that remain and aren't deleted. The ones left outside >> changes each frame as well. >> >> Anyone have any sure fire methods / workarounds that don't involve having >> helper nulls to delete the remaining ones outside? >> >> -- >> Eric Thivierge >> =============== >> Character TD / RnD >> Hybride Technologies >> >> >> > >
