well that is what we are sorting out. if we need to compile our own PySide version/installer then guess what? the PySide license allows me to do that :)
i did build from source, but that was because i was trying to work around a bug in loading .ui files using the QUiLoader class. so are you using Python 2.6.x? or 2.7.x? s On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Stefan Kubicek <s...@tidbit-images.com>wrote: > Hi Steven, > > I tried to use PySide together with your PyQt4XSI plugin last year and > managed to get your basic demos running after replacing some lines of code > (I think it was mostly the import statements changed to point at > PySide.blah instead of the PyQt ones). No real problems I can remember, but > projects caught up with me and I couldn't try harder to find any. > > What proofed to be a major pita was (and still is) that I could not find > any x64 version of PySide that includes the Shiboken Python module out of > the box and is compatible with Python 2.6.x. There are a couple of > pre-built packages for download both from http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~** > gohlke/pythonlibs/#pyside<http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pyside>and > http://qt-project.org/wiki/**PySide_Binaries_Windows<http://qt-project.org/wiki/PySide_Binaries_Windows>, > but none of them includes shiboken.pyd as far as I could see. Back then I > was lucky and some kind sould sent me a compatible version of the module > (maybe that was even you? Sorry, I really can't recall) > > Meanwhile, from what I could learn from the net, the missing module seems > to be due to a bug in one of the PySide build scripts and allegedly has > been fixed months ago, it's just that nobody has made a new build with it > and made it publicly available yet (neither Gohlke nor the maintainers of > the PySide project and it's associated web pages), which is also where even > I feel that PySide is less well maintained compared to PyQt, admittedly. > > Did you compile Qt and PySide yourself or did you find an alternate source > with precompiled binaries? > > Ultimately, I think what's needed to get that missing module is a custom > PySide build compiled against Python 2.7.x and VS2010 (for SI2014) or > Python 2.6.x and VS2008 (for anything older than SI2014) and an as up to > date Qt version as possible (don't know if 5.x would be a good idea, 4.8.4 > seems to be the latest of the 4.x line). > > Early last week I finally had time to make another attempt and finally > managed to compile Qt 4.8.4 for x64 against Python 2.7.4 and VS2010 > (without Phonon, I skipped installing DX for now). Next on my list was to > compile PySide against that build to hopefully and finally get a compatible > version of this dreaded Shiboken module. But I'd rather skip all that and > just use yours, though I'm still really curious as to where you got it > from, in case you didn't compile yourself :-) > > In any way, if you still need or want more testers I'd love to give it a > shot. > > And as always, thanks for investing so much of your time into it. > > Stefan > > > > Hey Gang >> >> Tony Barbieri and I have been working on official support for PySide with >> the PyQtForSoftimage plugin and I need some testers... >> >> Who here wants to use PySide instead of PyQt4? It is a little rough right >> now so, only people that really want to use PySide should contact me. >> >> Thanks >> Steven >> >> > > -- > ------------------------------**------------- > Stefan Kubicek > ------------------------------**------------- > keyvis digital imagery > Alfred Feierfeilstraße 3 > A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf bei Wien > Phone: +43/699/12614231 > www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at > -- This email and its attachments are -- > --confidential and for the recipient only-- > >
