We've been running PySide in Softimage for awhile now. There have been some small issues, but for the most part it seems to work. There are definitely some strange cases with the way PySide interacts with Python's GC, and if you try to get too "fancy" with your code I've seen the desktop more than a few times.
I also prefer to use PySide due to licensing and the fact that a lot of apps are now shipping with it. We're really trying to write cross platform tools with minimal abstractions. -tony On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Jens Lindgren <jens.lindgren....@gmail.com>wrote: > Would love to try it out Steven but I don't have time right now :( > I prefer to use PySide instead of PyQT so this is very welcomed. > > /Jens > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Raffaele Fragapane < > raffsxsil...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> The difference is pySide isn't licensing hell, and AD is going that way. >> I reckon that's reason enough to do whatever we can to speed up adoption >> and finding rough edges as soon as possible ;) >> >> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Jeremie Passerin >> <gerem....@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Can I ask what's the main differences between PySide and PyQt4 ? >>> Is that just licensing ? >>> >>> Jeremie >>> >>> >>> On 9 May 2013 17:04, Steven Caron <car...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Gang >>>> >>>> Tony Barbieri and I have been working on official support for PySide >>>> with the PyQtForSoftimage plugin and I need some testers... >>>> >>>> Who here wants to use PySide instead of PyQt4? It is a little rough >>>> right now so, only people that really want to use PySide should contact me. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Steven >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it >> and let them flee like the dogs they are! >> > > > > -- > Jens Lindgren > -------------------------- > Lead Technical Director > Magoo 3D Studios <http://www.magoo3dstudios.com/> > -- -tony
