I remember the system being very fast and interactive compared to softimage|3D, 
but yeah, PITA to have to composite everything.

The manipulators for SI Particle were actually pretty nice and intuitive.  They 
needed to be as the software lacked the mouse driven manipulation found in most 
3d packages.

Matt



From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Jeff McFall
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 11:29 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Friday Flashback #142

I remember that.  I was sooo looking forward to having a particle system again 
after moving from a Wavefront system.
It wasn't quite what I had hoped for but way better than nothing and I was able 
to make a lot of use it.

Kind of ironic about how Soft was NOT known for its "Particle System" 
capabilities back then.

I like this quote
Render the particle animation. Then composite the particle animation using the 
depth information from the z-channel of the SOFTIMAGE 3D rendered images to 
create seamless three-dimensional
animation with a particle effect."

That was fine if you did not mind a fully aliased comp  :)  Not to mention that 
I only had about a 500 MB hard drive if I remember correctly...
Those Zpics were kind of heavy for the time and with that size of storage.

Jeff

From: 
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
 [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Blair
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 11:17 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Friday Flashback #142

Friday Flashback #142
SOFTIMAGE|PARTICLE
http://wp.me/powV4-2Sk

Reply via email to