That's a decision-maker right there.
On 4 March 2014 18:00, Matt Morris <matt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Completely agreed, its the worst possible decision. Why the hell would you > they be bothered about an old discontinued software licence hanging around? > > Its making cancelling subscription a highly likely option. Way to lose > your customers Autodesk. > > > > > On 4 March 2014 17:50, Adam Sale <adamfs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I totally agree Arvid. I know I will need to revisit old scenes and >> projects, and this totally shoots us in the foot/ head. >> This is a completely unacceptable move on the part of AD. >> Let us keep our old licenses, AND migrate. What harm is there in keeping >> the old licenses around? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Arvid Björn <arvidbj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Excuse me, but THIS IS BULLSHIT: >>> >>> *"Please note that the right to use the Softimage license will terminate >>> at the end of the transition period if you are still on Subscription. You >>> will be transitioned to the latest release of either 3ds Max or Maya >>> depending on your initial choice. If you want to continue to use your >>> Softimage license after Feb 1, 2016 you should not renew your Subscription >>> contract for a period beyond that date. You will be able to continue to use >>> Softimage but will forfeit any future updates to either 3ds Max or Maya." * >>> >>> I can see how offering Maya/Max might be a parting gift, but how can you >>> deny the continued use of Softimage after the two year transition period? >>> No fucking way in hell we'll just throw all of our data from almost 10 >>> years back into the lake, we'll need the ability to open older Softimage >>> projects INDEFINITELY. >>> >>> Basically, there is absolutely NO way forward with Autodesk at this >>> pont, I have to keep access available. Rethink, respond and change this >>> policy ASAP, thanks. >>> >>> >> > > > -- > www.matinai.com >
