I can't believe what I'm reading. Wonder if anyone actually sat down and
thought about this properly?
On Mar 4, 2014 9:08 PM, "Jason S" <jasonsta...@gmail.com> wrote:

> revenue accounting guidelines
>
>
> On 03/04/14 16:06, Maurice Patel wrote:
>
>> Hi Jens,
>> Yes, if you want to keep using Softimage after two years that is the
>> case. This really is a transition offer and our ability to offer free
>> software was conditional on customers fully transitioning either 3ds Max
>> and Maya. I will pass on the feedback but these conditions were imposed by
>> the revenue accounting guidelines we follow.
>> Maurice
>>
>> Maurice Patel
>> Autodesk : Tél:  514 954-7134
>>
>> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-bounces@
>> listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Jens Lindgren
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:41 PM
>> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> Subject: Re: License to END if you migrate?!
>>
>> @Maurice: Right now I'm on a 3ds Max Entertainemnt Creation Suite Premium
>> license, wich as I understand it, will be upgraded to a Ultimate Suite.
>> Am I supposed to not renew my subscription if I want to keep using
>> Softimage, and loose all Autodesk software, and then buy a new fucking
>> Suite Ultimate to get Max, Maya, Mudbox, Motionbuilder again?
>> I just can't believe I even have to ask the question, it's just so stupid.
>>
>> /Jens
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Rob Chapman<tekano....@gmail.com<mailto:
>> tekano....@gmail.com>>  wrote:
>> like we could trust our own various crooked governments to sort this
>> particular piece of greed&  bullshit out. HAHAHA..
>>
>> a small example. are Strands going to be ready in Maya by 2016? or is Max
>> that gets this small nugget of Softimage legacy uniqueness. An ICE plugin
>> perhaps?
>>
>> is there a list made where all the non easily transferable useful bits
>>  (and made a living off) are to be found or eventually end up in 2016?
>>  because they sure as hell do not exist right now in any other software
>> that autodesk currently offers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 March 2014 20:11, Paul Griswold<pgriswold@
>> fusiondigitalproductions.com<mailto:pgriswold@
>> fusiondigitalproductions.com>>  wrote:
>> I doubt you'd be able to do anything class action (though I'm not a
>> lawyer, so what do I know).  But I do think if enough people contacted
>> their government representative about Autodesk's anti-competitive movement
>> / monopolistic behavior, you'd see something happen.
>>
>> Autodesk is what Microsoft used to be.  Perhaps it's time for a little
>> government oversight / investigation?
>>
>> -Paul
>>
>> [https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=acGdyaXN3b2xkQGZ1c2lvbmRpZ2l0Y
>> Wxwcm9kdWN0aW9ucy5jb20%3D&type=zerocontent&guid=5ea39e17-2146-43c0-8bc8-
>> 94b59c9df0b1]ᐧ<https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=acGdyaXN3b2xkQGZ1c2lvbmRpZ2l0YWxwcm9kdWN0aW9ucy5jb20%3D&type=zerocontent&guid=5ea39e17-2146-43c0-8bc8-94b59c9df0b1]%E1%90%A7>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jens Lindgren
>> --------------------------
>> Lead Technical Director
>> Magoo 3D Studios<http://www.magoo3dstudios.com/>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to