+1 that. 2015-03-18 11:40 GMT+01:00 Vincent Langer <m...@vincentlanger.com>:
> I think this is a softimage thing. Not a alembic thing. Softimage is > pretty slow with lots of objects. > I bet if the cinema guy would export all objects as one it would perform > very good in softimage. > Cheers > Am 18.03.2015 11:32 schrieb "Morten Bartholdy" <x...@colorshopvfx.dk>: > > I am stuck on Softimage 2013SP1 so I am using Crate for opening alembic >> files. I am currently working with shots where we import alembic files >> created in Cinema4D and they contain many thousands of objects that scale >> and rotate. With Crate they are pretty slow to work with - scrubbing the >> timeline is slow, and creating overrides in various passes is slow. >> >> >> I can see our Maya artists can actually scrub the timeline in Maya >> pretty inetractively with the same files, so I take it the built in version >> from Autodesk is faster that Crate. >> >> >> I am curious to know if someone here have tried the built in alembic >> loader in a newer version of Softimage and had the opportunity to compare >> it to the one in Maya? >> >> Best >> >> Morten >> >> >> >
