I suspected this might be a factor - sux :/ MB
Den 18. marts 2015 kl. 12:51 skrev Vincent Ullmann <vincent.ullm...@googlemail.com>: > +1 that. > > 2015-03-18 11:40 GMT+01:00 Vincent Langer < m...@vincentlanger.com > <mailto:m...@vincentlanger.com> > : > > > > I think this is a softimage thing. Not a alembic thing. Softimage is pretty > > slow with lots of objects. > > I bet if the cinema guy would export all objects as one it would perform > > very good in softimage. > > Cheers > > > > Am 18.03.2015 11:32 schrieb "Morten Bartholdy" < x...@colorshopvfx.dk > > <mailto:x...@colorshopvfx.dk> >: > > > > > I am stuck on Softimage 2013SP1 so I am using Crate for opening alembic > > > files. I am currently working with shots where we import alembic files > > > created in Cinema4D and they contain many thousands of objects that scale > > > and rotate. With Crate they are pretty slow to work with - scrubbing the > > > timeline is slow, and creating overrides in various passes is slow. > > > > > > I can see our Maya artists can actually scrub the timeline in Maya pretty > > > inetractively with the same files, so I take it the built in version from > > > Autodesk is faster that Crate. > > > > > > I am curious to know if someone here have tried the built in alembic > > > loader > > > in a newer version of Softimage and had the opportunity to compare it to > > > the one in Maya? > > > > > > Best > > > Morten > > >
