That sounds cool - ah well...

MB




Den 18. marts 2015 kl. 14:44 skrev Luc-Eric Rousseau <luceri...@gmail.com>:

> 
> Maya can stream alembic directly to the GPU without ever creating objects
> in the scene, so that may be another thing you saw
> 
> On Mar 18, 2015 9:15 AM, "Morten Bartholdy" < x...@colorshopvfx.dk
> <mailto:x...@colorshopvfx.dk> > wrote:
> > I suspected this might be a factor - sux :/
> > 
> > MB
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Den 18. marts 2015 kl. 12:51 skrev Vincent Ullmann <
> > vincent.ullm...@googlemail.com <mailto:vincent.ullm...@googlemail.com> >:
> > 
> > > +1 that.
> > > 
> > > 2015-03-18 11:40 GMT+01:00 Vincent Langer < m...@vincentlanger.com
> > > <mailto:m...@vincentlanger.com> > :
> > > > 
> > > > I think this is a softimage thing. Not a alembic thing. Softimage is
> > > > pretty
> > > > slow with lots of objects.
> > > > I bet if the cinema guy would export all objects as one it would perform
> > > > very good in softimage.
> > > > Cheers
> > > > 
> > > > Am 18.03.2015 11:32 schrieb "Morten Bartholdy" < x...@colorshopvfx.dk
> > > > <mailto:x...@colorshopvfx.dk> >:
> > > > 
> > > > > I am stuck on Softimage 2013SP1 so I am using Crate for opening
> > > > > alembic
> > > > > files. I am currently working with shots where we import alembic files
> > > > > created in Cinema4D and they contain many thousands of objects that
> > > > > scale
> > > > > and rotate. With Crate they are pretty slow to work with - scrubbing
> > > > > the
> > > > > timeline is slow, and creating overrides in various passes is slow.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I can see our Maya artists can actually scrub the timeline in Maya
> > > > > pretty
> > > > > inetractively with the same files, so I take it the built in version
> > > > > from
> > > > > Autodesk is faster that Crate.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am curious to know if someone here have tried the built in alembic
> > > > > loader
> > > > > in a newer version of Softimage and had the opportunity to compare it
> > > > > to
> > > > > the one in Maya?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best
> > > > > Morten
> > > > > 
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to