How about those programs the divide the screen up? Useful? -----Original Message----- From: "Mirko Jankovic" <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com> Sent: 9/23/2015 4:51 PM To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com" <softimage@listproc.autodesk.com> Subject: Re: 34 inch monitor
honestly I thing that 2 monitors will always be better then single one, meaning two smaller resolution compared to single higher resolution. ofc if difference is not really really big. there are some issues if you are using tablet with two monitors in switching from displays to keep proportions normal but again more space is better. as for issues of SI and 4k well... it could be better with scaling working with win10 which it doesn't right now but if your eyesight is not yet gone :) you can get used to it now reading, i guess that 34" is one of those ultra wide screen? I have a smaller version of ultra wide, 29" dell one 2560x1080 resolution if I remember correctly. It is good for gaming but it;s ultra wide didn't really fit me for work, especially with tablet. even with setting up tablet to us proportional surface it never felt the same and I work with tablet inside SI as well so it was big push away from all that ultra wide game. It is nice for gaming abut for work.. sticking to 16:9 or :10 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Phil Harbath <phil.harb...@jamination.com> wrote: > I am wondering if it is overwhelming compared to a 24 x 2. The one I am > looking at is not 4k, something like 3000 by 1600, which is for the best > since reading comments about Softimage and 4k. Can it replace 2 monitors. > ------------------------------ > From: Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com> > Sent: 9/23/2015 4:25 PM > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > Subject: Re: 34 inch monitor > > what kind of comments are you looking for really, also which resolution? > > got 3x 32" 4k monitors and I can only say what I knew before moving > gradually from single 14" yeeaaaaars ago to this now.. it is never enough > space :) > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Phil Harbath < > phil.harb...@jamination.com> wrote: > >> Has anyone used a 34 inch monitor for mostly 3D work, any comments >> appreciated. >> ------------------------------ >> From: pete...@skynet.be >> Sent: 9/23/2015 4:11 AM >> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> Subject: Re: 3Delight (free) - 8 core restriction and toon renders >> >> but did you check in task manager to see if there are actually 8 cores >> active? >> >> in my tests with the 8-core restricted version, there were only 4 cores >> active as before – and I’ve seen it mentioned here as well. (not saying >> that what you got out of those 4 cores wasn’t cool) >> >> >> >> *From:* Pierre Schiller <activemotionpictu...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:34 AM >> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> *Subject:* Re: 3Delight (free) - 8 core restriction and toon renders >> >> yes, 3delight is really fast. >> 8 cores = free. Want more cores? one should pay for commerce version. >> But I still prefer Redshift. I haven´t done tests on that. >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Eric Turman <i.anima...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> just looking at the timeline on youtube 3Delight looks almost twice as >>> fast to render the inklines. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Actually for inkline speed, isn't it roughly as fast as MR? >>>> >>>> By the way, even in the viewport your toon shading looks neat, what is >>>> it? >>>> >>>> >>>> BTW#2 : So you got 8 cores running? what was preventing it before? >>>> >>>> >>>> cheers, & thanks for this glimpse! >>>> J >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/22/15 13:06, Pierre Schiller wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi guys, I wanted to test out how speedy is 3delight compared to native >>>> MentalRay (we know there will be a difference). So I took a minute and did >>>> a short video comparing render toon lines on 3delight and mental ray. >>>> >>>> https://youtu.be/mlJt2iYGsq8 >>>> >>>> But if anyone could help me out with this question, I´d finish the >>>> tutorial as it was meant to be: >>>> How could I "store in channel" to create matte ids on 3Delight? It >>>> didn´t read color 4 pass through nor Store in channel. >>>> >>>> So what I did was to create a new pass and partition all elements with >>>> constant materials. Works, but takes too much time in a heavy scene. >>>> In the end I store in channel using MR but then the scene crashed, when >>>> I selected MR for that pass only renderer.... >>>> >>>> Anyone with more 3delight experience could help me out on this, please? >>>> Thanks. :D >>>> >>>> Cheers. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Portfolio 2013 <http://be.net/3dcinetv> >>>> >>>> > [The entire original message is not included.] > [The entire original message is not included.]
