Chiming in from VFX Pipeline perspective on which I have a worked for quite a number of years (though not in tracking), there are these 3 or 4 dccs as mentioned above that I have seen the most experienced tracking artists using each one of them for solving specific shot problems. In the end a solid tracking artist would preferably have most of them in their arsenal to track any shot thrown their way using a combination or one of them. Sometimes tracking can be a brutal and needs some serious fire fighting. So I would say all of them have their pros and cons but by a little margin PF Track wins the race.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > OK Brilliant! I'll check out some of those options. > Sounds like PF Track might be my first point of contact. > Thanks List! > > > On 20 July 2016 at 09:05, Olivier Jeannel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've seen some nice thing coming out of nuke tracking (I don't use Nuke >> ..yet) >> Other than that PF track. >> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Adam Sale <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> PF Track all the way in my opinion. Node based interface for combining >>> all kinds of matchmove , object tracks, stabilization, undistortion, >>> redistortion etc. >>> Its cheaper by a long shot than 3dEq, though I can't speak for the >>> rental aspect costs. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Francois Lord <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Syntheyes for low price, precision of 2D tracking and speed of 2D >>>> tracking. >>>> PFTrack for overall speed and versatility. >>>> 3DEqualizer for difficult shots and precision of 3D track. >>>> NukeX for simple shots if you already have a license. >>>> >>>> If you need to choose just one, I would pick PFTrack. The node based >>>> workflow is awesome, but the rest of the UI is awful. A good combination is >>>> to 2D track in Syntheyes and 3D solve in PFTrack. >>>> >>>> On 2016-07-19 10:46, Rob Wuijster wrote: >>>> >>>> There's PFTrack, and SynthEyes is used a lot as well. SynthEyes has >>>> decent pricing too. >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> \/-------------\/----------------\/ >>>> >>>> On 19-7-2016 16:18, Cristobal Infante wrote: >>>> >>>> I would recommend 3DEqualizer, it's probably the best one out there. >>>> You can now rent it. >>>> FXPHD have some good intro courses I believe. >>>> >>>> On 19 July 2016 at 10:47, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> What are people using for motion tracking / match moving these days? I >>>>> haven't needed to do it for a while. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------ >>>>> Softimage Mailing List. >>>>> To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] >>>>> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ >>>> Softimage Mailing List. >>>> To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] >>>> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ >>>> Softimage Mailing List. >>>> To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] >>>> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------ >>> Softimage Mailing List. >>> To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] >>> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. >>> >> >> >> ------ >> Softimage Mailing List. >> To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] >> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. >> > > > > -- > Chris Marshall > Mint Motion Limited > 029 20 37 27 57 > 07730 533 115 > www.mintmotion.co.uk > www.dot3d.com > > > > ------ > Softimage Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] > with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. > --
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
