I was speaking about this with Andy a few weeks back as I’m the same. I ideally like to build single function VOP and Wrangle nodes. Andy’s view was that in general terms this is a best practise as you not only find it easier to debug a network but you also get to build a library of discreet reusable nodes that are bespoke to the way you like to work.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Andy Goehler Sent: 07 April 2017 19:16 To: Official Softimage Users Mailing List. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/xsi_list <softimage@listproc.autodesk.com> Subject: Re: Houdini Digital Assets for Softies Hi Jason, maybe it’s a workflow thingy. I like to break functionality down into separate nodes and not try to do everything inside one gigantic Attribute VOP. And I find that lots of these are shared as HDAs, less so for VOP subnets. I mostly build and organize at the SOP level. But you’re right there should be more VOP HDAs for common repeating functionality. Happy weekend Andy On Apr 7, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com <mailto:jasonsta...@gmail.com> > wrote: So now we have 'compounds' with custom port names, now how/why are we not seeing dozens of those everywhere?
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
