I would like to support Mark's observation and add one more: While fine and chartered drafts like MIBs (20 minutes) and multicast (30 minutes) surely have discussion merit, besides merit of non-chartered drafts like B4-NAT-bypass, DHCP- .., etc, (30 minutes in all), given that WG facetime comes at a premium it would be fair to prioritize discussions around the issues that appear to be in most need of such facetime. In view of this assigning 4 drafts of stateless46 into collectively 20 minutes appears to be questionable, and more so given past precedent in terms of the difficulty in getting a discussion going in this WG.
Thanks, Wojciech. On 19 July 2011 11:24, Mark Townsley <[email protected]> wrote: > > The schedule is obviously rather busy. Here's a suggestion: Softwires has 30 > minutes of Multicast transition presentation, while we have an entire BoF > devoted to the subject earlier in the week. Do we really need to schedule > time for this twice? > > - Mark > > > On Jul 18, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Alain Durand wrote: > >> The agenda has been posted. >> >> - Alain & Yong. >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
