Le 21 juil. 2011 à 17:48, Alain Durand a écrit : > > On Jul 21, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Wojciech Dec wrote: > >> So is stateless (apparently), yet the agenda seems to prefer to >> generously assign time to everything but this topic, which by many >> accounts is what the WG is very interested in discussing. It also >> seems that I'm not the the only one thinking that this does not look >> quite reasonable... >> >> -Wojciech > > items related to stateless are #5, #6. #7, #8, #9 and #19 for a total of 55mm > out of 150min
Yes, but among these 55 mn, 40 mn are to discuss motivations while the consensus, on the discussion list, is clear that draft-operators-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation expresses well why the work on solutions should start. (Incidentally, if the chairs have much to say about motivations that wasn't expressed on the list, having a document well before the meeting would be appreciated.) Compared to these 40 min, 5 mn for each of the major ID's on solutions is dramatically disproportionate. Thank you for what you can do. RD > This does not quite look like assigning time to everything but this topic. > > Alain. > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
