On Jul 21, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Wojciech Dec wrote: > So is stateless (apparently), yet the agenda seems to prefer to > generously assign time to everything but this topic, which by many > accounts is what the WG is very interested in discussing. It also > seems that I'm not the the only one thinking that this does not look > quite reasonable... > > -Wojciech
items related to stateless are #5, #6. #7, #8, #9 and #19 for a total of 55mm out of 150min This does not quite look like assigning time to everything but this topic. Alain. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
