I would agree that people in the floor are interested in technologies and comparision et al. would better to allocate more time on
Quite more importantly, those stuffs have been discussed in the ML more than others which just post the submission information Thanks -Hui 2011/7/22 Rémi Després <[email protected]> > > Le 21 juil. 2011 à 17:48, Alain Durand a écrit : > > > > > On Jul 21, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Wojciech Dec wrote: > > > >> So is stateless (apparently), yet the agenda seems to prefer to > >> generously assign time to everything but this topic, which by many > >> accounts is what the WG is very interested in discussing. It also > >> seems that I'm not the the only one thinking that this does not look > >> quite reasonable... > >> > >> -Wojciech > > > > items related to stateless are #5, #6. #7, #8, #9 and #19 for a total of > 55mm out of 150min > > Yes, but among these 55 mn, 40 mn are to discuss motivations while the > consensus, on the discussion list, is clear that > draft-operators-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation expresses well why the > work on solutions should start. > (Incidentally, if the chairs have much to say about motivations that wasn't > expressed on the list, having a document well before the meeting would be > appreciated.) > > Compared to these 40 min, 5 mn for each of the major ID's on solutions is > dramatically disproportionate. > > Thank you for what you can do. > RD > > > > This does not quite look like assigning time to everything but this > topic. > > > > Alain. > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
