[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656485#action_12656485 ]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-913: ------------------------------------ How many cores how often? Does changing it to static make any mesurable difference? A bottleneck has to be *somewhere* -- perhaps it is not really an issue (i don't know if it is or is not) -- it sounds like this was designed thinking the function is called infrequently while your use case is different... > org/apache/solr/handler/SnapPuller.java - Expensive Pattern object made > static > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-913 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-913 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: clients - java > Environment: Tomcat 6, JRE 6 > Reporter: Kay Kay > Fix For: 1.4 > > Attachments: SOLR-913.patch > > Original Estimate: 2h > Remaining Estimate: 2h > > In the class - org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller - there seems to be an > expensive Pattern object created locally in the method > static Integer readInterval(String interval) ; > Pattern instances are better created as static objects and reused. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.