On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > I thought I defined it well... hmmm. > I'll take another stab, outlining using dynamic fields in both > scenarios (explicitly defined dynamic fields, and automatically > defined as part of the creation of the point class). I think we > really do need to get concrete about our options at this point.
Agreed, code would be good.
