On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >> I thought I defined it well... hmmm. >> I'll take another stab, outlining using dynamic fields in both >> scenarios (explicitly defined dynamic fields, and automatically >> defined as part of the creation of the point class). I think we >> really do need to get concrete about our options at this point. > > Agreed, code would be good.
I had code (untested) just using dynamic fields... you changed it :-P But I meant actual fieldType and field definitions, and what fields get indexed as a result, and how type lookups on those fields happens. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
