SOLR-215 support multiple indices on a single Solr instance. It does *not* support searching of multiple indices at once (e.g. parallel search) and merging of results.
This has nothing to do with NFS, though. Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share ----- Original Message ---- From: James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:45:06 AM Subject: Re: Multiple doc types in schema I see SOLR-215 from this mail. Does it now really support multi index and search it will return merged data? for example: i wanna search: aaa, and i have index1, index2, index3, index4,,,,it should return the result from index1,index2,index3, index4 and merge result by score, datetime, or other thing. Does it support NFS and how its performance? 2007/6/21, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This sounds like a potentially good use-case for SOLR-215! > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-215 > > Otis > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 6:58:10 AM > Subject: Re: Multiple doc types in schema > > > : This is based on my understanding that solr/lucene does not > : have the concept of document type. It only sees fields. > : > : Is my understanding correct? > > it is. > > : It seems a bit unclean to mix fields of all document types > : in the same schema though. Or, is there a way to allow multiple > : document types in the schema, and specify what type to use > : when indexing and searching? > > it's really just an issue of semantics ... the schema.xml is where you > list all of the fields you need in your index, any notion of doctype is > entire artificial ... you could group all of the > fields relating to doctypeA in one section of the schema.xml, then have a > big <!-- ##...## --> line and then list the fields in doctypeB, etc... but > wat if there are fields you use in both "doctypes" ? .. how much you "mix" > them is entirely up to you. > > > > -Hoss > > > > > -- regards jl
