Well, correct me if I'm wrong.
Your suggestion is to use species field as a source of genus field. We try
with this
<copyField source="attr_conten*" dest="species"/>
<copyField source="species" dest="genus"/>
Where species work as described and genus just use a KWF, like this:
<fieldType name="genus_type" class="solr.TextField"
positionIncrementGap="0">
<analyzer type="index">
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.KeepWordFilterFactory" words="genus.txt"
ignoreCase="true"/>
</analyzer>
<analyzer type="query">
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
</analyzer>
</fieldType>
But now, the problem now is different.
When we try the behavior in analysis section in solr provided UI it works as
expected.
Nevertheless, when we use it at indexing time (When we post pdf files, to
extractor) the field doesn't even appear. We think it's because the info
becomes from another copyField.
Did I misunderstand your suggestion?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4347013.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
