I should mention I¹m also hanging out in the Solr IRC Channel today under
the nick ³apatheticnow² if anyone wants to follow up in real time during
business hours EST.

On 11/6/18, 11:39 AM, "Shawn Heisey" <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:

>On 11/6/2018 9:06 AM, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
>> For example - 75k request per minute going to this one box, and 3.5k
>>RPM to all other nodes in the cloud.
>>
>> All of those extra requests on the one box are
>>"/solr/admin/collections?collection=collectionName&action=CLUSTERSTATUS&w
>>t=javabin&version=2"
>
>That sounds like either a bug or some kind of problem in your setup.
>Over a thousand requests per second will overwhelm a single Solr node,
>even if the info can be satisfied entirely from memory and doesn't
>require complex calculations or large-scale data retrieval like a
>regular query does.
>
>If you manually execute that request, do you get a response, and does it
>return quickly or take a significant amount of time?  If the request
>itself has problems, maybe CloudSolrClient is repeating it frequently
>because it's not getting the info it's after.  Can you share the full
>log entry from solr.log for one of those requests?
>
>I try to keep an eye on things with CloudSolrClient, but I have very
>limited experience with it.  I cannot imagine that the behavior you're
>seeing is normal.  It sounds very wrong to me.
>
>Since I do not know all that much about how CloudSolrClient's background
>threads work, I cannot say for sure whether it's a bug or a problem with
>your setup.  Can you try upgrading the Solr jars in your client app to
>7.5.0 and see if that makes any difference?  What version of Solr are
>you running on the server side?
>
>> Our plan right now is to roll back to the basic HTTP client and pass
>>all traffic through our load balancer, but would like to understand if
>>this is an expected interaction for the Cloud Client, a misconfiguration
>>on our end, or a bug
>
>At least you have that as an option!  Some people might not be able to
>do that.
>
>Thanks,
>Shawn
>

Reply via email to