Nope, your schema defines a single index with alle languages being stored. The other way would be MultiCore/MultipleIndexes as described here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin and http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes#head-e517417ef9b96e32168b2cf35ab6ff393f360d59
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:05 PM, sunnyfr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But I don't get, if you look in my schema.xml it's what I've done, multi > index? > So I was right ? > > > Hannes Carl Meyer-2 wrote: > > > > Hi Ralf, > > > > you should also check on the example inside the Solr 1.3 download > package! > > > > The management of multiple languages inside multiple indexes really makes > > sense in terms of configuration efforts (look at your big kahuna > > configuration file!), performance and gives an additional "scalibility" > > feature (in fact that you index/search in multiple cores which could be > > theoretically placed on different machines). > > > > But, from the perspecitve of the search client you will have to execute > > search processes on multiple cores simultaneously. If this is feasible > you > > should really think about using multiple indexes. > > > > Regards, > > > > Hannes > > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hannes Carl Meyer schrieb: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> is it really neccessary to put it all into one index? You could also > use > >>> the > >>> Solr MultiCore/MultipleIndexes feature and seperate by language. > >>> > >>> > >> Is there a good webpage with infos about the multiindex-feature ? > >> I know http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes but there is not > >> enough > >> info :-( > >> > >> > >> Greets -Ralf- > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-solr1.3-what-would-you-reckon--tp19954805p19956421.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
