Hi All,

Is anyone using Solr (and thus the lucene index) as there database store.

Up to now, we have been using a database to build Solr from. However, given
that lucene already keeps the stored data intact, and that rebuilding from
solr to solr can be very fast, the need for the separate database does not
seem so necessary.

It seems totally possible to maintain just the solr shards and treat them as
the database (backups, redundancy, etc are already built right in). The idea
that we would need to rebuild from scratch seems unlikely and the speed
boost by using solr shards for data massaging and reindexing seems very
appealing.

Has anyone else thought about this or done this and ran into problems that
caused them to go back to a seperate database model? Is there a critical
need you can think is missing?

-- 
Regards,

Ian Connor

Reply via email to