I am thinking that my example was too simple/generic :-U. It is possible for more several dynamic fields to exist and other functionality to be required. i.e. what about if my example had read:
http://localhost:8994/solr/select?q=((Foo1:3 OR Foo2:3 OR Foo3:3 OR … Foo999:3) AND (Bar1:1 OR Bar2:1 OR Bar3:1...Bar999:1) AND (Etc1:7 OR Etc2:7 OR Etc3:7...Etc:999:7) obviously a nasty query (and care would be needed for MAX_BOOLEAN_CLAUSES). that said, are there other mechanisms to better handle that type of query, i.e.: http://localhost:8994/solr/select?q=(myfunction(‘Foo’, 3) AND myfunction('Bar', 1) AND (myfunction('Etc', 7)) gdeconto wrote: > > say I have a dynamic field called Foo* (where * can be in the hundreds) > and want to search Foo* for a value of 3 (for example) > > I know I can do this via this: > > http://localhost:8994/solr/select?q=(Foo1:3 OR Foo2:3 OR Foo3:3 OR … > Foo999:3) > > However, is there a better way? i.e. is there some way to query by a > function I create, possibly something like this: > > http://localhost:8994/solr/select?q=myfunction(‘Foo’, 3) > > where myfunction itself iterates thru all the instances of Foo* > > any help appreciated > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-scan-dynamic-field-without-specifying-each-field-in-query-tp25280228p25283094.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
