Oh, here's a modified/improved version of what I described in my first email:
1. Queries like "id:123" which work fine in /solr/admin web interface but returns nothing in Luke. Query "*:*" returns all records fine in Luke. I expect Luke returns the same result as /solr/admin since it's essentially a Lucene query? 2. When Luke displays records with query "*:*", it shows the string values fine but the numeric fields and date fields show blank. It shows DocID OK, though. I expect Luke to be able to show non-string values, too. On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Then you have to provide a lot more detail about what you did > and what you're seeing and what you think you should see. You > might review this page: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists > > Best > Erick > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:41 PM, jlist9 <jli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I find in the Plugins tab that the default is PersianAnalyzer. I switched >> to StandardAnalyzer and tried a few different Lucene Compatibility values >> but it didn't help :-( >> >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > The Solr admin page as access to (and uses) the field >> > definitions you've put in the config file. Luke has no >> > knowledge of this configuration, you have to choose >> > your analyzer from the drop down and select the one >> > closest to what's in your config file for SOLR. Are you >> > perhaps using an analyzer in Luke that doesn't >> > play nice with the definitions in SOLR? >> > >> > HTH >> > Erick >> > >> > >> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:55 PM, jlist9 <jli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I tried the stand-alone Luke tool (not Luke request handler) to browse >> >> a solr index and find a few strange things: >> >> >> >> 1. Queries like "id:123" which work fine in /solr/admin web interface >> >> returns nothing in Luke. "*:*" returns everything fine in Luke. >> >> >> >> 2. When Luke displays records with query "*:*", it shows the string >> >> values fine but the numeric fields and date fields shows blank. It shows >> >> DocID OK, though. >> >> >> >> Anyone else has tried Luke on a solr index? >> >> >> > >> >
