> I'm likely to try playing with moving cores between hosts soon. In > theory it shouldn't be hard. We'll see what the practice is like!
Right, in theory it's quite simple, in practice I've setup a master, then a slave, then had to add replication to both, then call create core, then replicate, then unload core on the master. It's nightmarish to setup. The problem is, it freezes each core into a respective role, so if I wanted to then 'move' the slave, I can't because it's still setup as a slave. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:38 -0700, "Jason Rutherglen" > <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Mark, >> >> Nice email address. I personally have no idea, maybe ask Shay Banon >> to post an answer? I think it's possible to make Solr more elastic, >> eg, it's currently difficult to make it move cores between servers >> without a lot of manual labor. > > I'm likely to try playing with moving cores between hosts soon. In > theory it shouldn't be hard. We'll see what the practice is like! > > Upayavira > --- > Enterprise Search Consultant at Sourcesense UK, > Making Sense of Open Source > >
