Hi Ahmet,
>>> I don't use it myself (but I will soon), so I
>>> may be wrong, but did you try
>>> to use the ComplexPhraseQueryParser :
>>>
>>> ComplexPhraseQueryParser
>>> QueryParser which
>>> permits complex phrase query syntax eg "(john
>>> jon jonathan~) peters*".
>>>
>>> It seems that you could do such type of queries :
>>>
>>> GOK:"IA 38*"
>>
>> yes that sounds interesting.
>> But I don't know how to get and install it into solr. Cam
>> you give me a hint?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604
I tried to follow this recipe, adapting it to the solr 3.2 I am testing right
now.
The first try gave me a message
[java] !!!!!!! Couldn't get license file for
/Installer/solr/apache-solr-3.2.0/solr/lib/ComplexPhrase-1.0.jar
[java] At least one file does not have a license, or it's license name is
not in the proper format. See the logs.
BUILD FAILED
so I created a fake license
ComplexPhrase-LICENSE-MIT.txt
for ComplexPhrase and tried again, which ran through successfully, I hope this
is OK.
I registered queryparser not to solrhome/conf/solrconfig.xml (no such thing,
I'm running multiple cores) but to
solrhome/cores/lit/conf/solrconfig.xml
and could search successfully for
{!complexphrase}GOK:"IC 62*"
> But it seems that you can achieve what you want with vanilla solr.
>
> I don't follow the multivalued part in your example but you can tokenize
> "IA 300; IC 330; IA 317; IA 318" into these 4 tokens
>
> IA 300
> IC 330
> IA 314
> IA 318
I didn't have to split them up, they are already separated as field with
multiValued="true".
But I need to be able to search for IA 310 - IA 319 with one call,
{!complexphrase}GOK:"IA 31?"
will do this now, or even for
{!complexphrase}GOK:"IA 3*"
to catch all those in one go.
Thanks, this helped a lot
Thomas
