O. Klein wrote > > > O. Klein wrote >> >> Hmm, now the synonyms aren't highlighted anymore. >> >> OK back to basic (im using trunk and FVH). >> >> What is the way to go about if I want to search on a field without >> stopwords, but still want to highlight the stopwords? (and still >> highlight synonyms and stemmed words)? >> > > I made new field content_hl to prevent problems coming from copyField. > > When using hl.q=content_hl:(spell Check) I now get highlighting including > stopwords. > > but when using hl.q=content_hl:(SC) where SC is synonym I get no > highlighting. > > Can you verify if synonyms work when using hl.q? >
OK I got it working by using hl.q=content_hl:(spell Check) content_text:(spell Check) but it makes no sense to me. only difference between the 2 fields is the use of Stopwords. What's also weird is that a query like hl.q=content_spell:(SC) also highlights synonyms, eventhough this field has no synonyms. I have not been able to find any logic in the behavior of hl.q and how it analyses the query. Could you explain how it is supposed to work? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3743616.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
