Jack, Yes.
I expect SOLR should give same search results as Luked does. Term analyzer gives correct answer in SOLR as expected. But SOLR does not return correct search results. I don't know why. Erol Akarsu On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>wrote: > So, does that highlight the problem for you or not? Is the term analyzed > as you expected? > > -- Jack Krupansky > > From: Erol Akarsu > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 8:44 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different results > > Jack, > > Thanks for help. > > I removed data folder of SOLR and indexed this sample doc from scratch, > there was no document in SOLR but only one. > > When I analysed , I can see stemming is correct and I can see these for > words "bul", "baş" ,"gör" and "umut" in SF row > I attached analyse screens > > Erol Akarsu > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com> > wrote: > > Have you tried using the Solr Admin Analysis page, using the word and a > few words of context for index analysis and the word alone for query > analysis? > > And be sure to fully reindex if you change ANYTHING in the schema fields > or field types. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > From: Erol Akarsu > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 10:38 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Luke and SOLR search giving different results > > > Hi, > > I am trying to apply SOLR for Turkish Language for my research. > > Instead of using language identification, I manually assigned Turkish > language for a sample test document. I have configured SOLR schema.xml, > activated the part below. I have added the attached document > testTurkishDoc.xml that is inserted to SOLR database. > > But searching for raw Lucene index through Luke and SOLR 4.0 search > though GUI is giving different results. In picture Selection_006.png, the > word "baş" is listed as top term. I search the word "baş" in Luke and I got > the result result that is only document, shown in Selection_004.png. > > But in SOLR GUI, I am getting empty result for word "baş" in picture > Selection_002.png. > > In the text we have features field, that has word "baştan" that is > being derived from root word "baş" in Turkish Grammar. Somehow, SOLR GUI is > doing search different than Luke. I could not figure it out why I could not > find it while getting in Luke. The same thing happens for words "umut", > "bul" and "gör". > > I will appreciate if you can help me to get same results from SOLR UI. > > > <field name="features"> > Firmalarsa "Nasılsa buldum oynatacak ünlüyü, neyleyim senaryoyu!" > diyerek baştan savma reklamlarla kotarmaya bakıyor işi. Futbolcu Arda Turan > ve büyük umutlarla Türkiye'ye getirilen Paris Hilton'un oynatıldığı giyim > firması reklamı da tam bir fiyasko. Birbirinden ünlü bu iki ismin oynadığı > reklam Arda'nın kabinde papağan gibi tekrarladığı "My darling!" repliği, > sonunda Paris'i görünce anlam veremediğimiz uyduruk bayılma sahnesi, bir de > Paris'in ancak 5 kez izledikten sonra anlaşılan "Paris seçti, firma yaptı, > Arda bayıldı." sözleriyle kazındı hafızalara, "Keşke unutabilsek!" > dedirterek. > </field> > > > > Added to schema.xml for SOLR: > > <field name="features" type="text_tr" indexed="true" stored="true" > multiValued="true"/> > <fieldType name="text_tr" class="solr.TextField" > positionIncrementGap="100"> > <analyzer type="index"> > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.TurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" > words="lang/stopwords_tr.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/> > <filter class="solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory" > language="Turkish"/> > </analyzer> > <analyzer type="query"> > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.TurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" > words="lang/stopwords_tr.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/> > <filter class="solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory" > language="Turkish"/> > </analyzer> > </fieldType> > > > >
