Great point.
<br><br><br>------- Original Message -------
On 1/3/2013 10:42 AM Per Steffensen wrote:<br>On 1/3/13 4:33 PM, Mark Miller
wrote:
<br>> This has pretty much become the standard across other distributed systems
and in the literat…err…books.
<br>Hmmm Im not sure you are right about that. Maybe more than one
<br>distributed system calls them "Replica", but there is also a lot that
<br>doesnt. But if you are right, thats at least a good valid argument to do
<br>it this way, even though I generally prefer "good logical naming" over
<br>"following bad naming from the industry" :-) Just because there is a lot
<br>of crap out there, doesnt mean that we also want to make crap. Maybe
<br>good logical naming could even be a small entry in the "Why Solr is
<br>better than its competitors" list :-)
<br>
