As an aside, I think one reason people feel compelled to deviate from the distributed jetty distribution is because the folder is named "example". I've had to explain to a few clients that this is a bit of a misnomer. The IT dept especially sees "example" and feels uncomfortable using that as a starting point for a jetty install. I wish it was called "default" or "bin" or something where its more obviously the default jetty distribution of Solr.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Roland Everaert <reveatw...@gmail.com>wrote: > In my case, the first time I had to deploy and configure solr on tomcat > (and jboss) it was a requirement to reuse as much as possible the > application/web server already in place. The next deployment I also use > tomcat, because I was used to deploy on tomcat and I don't know jetty at > all. > > I could ask the same question with regard to jetty. Why use/bundle(/ if not > recommend) jetty with solr over other webserver solutions? > > Regards, > > > Roland Everaert. > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alvaro Cabrerizo <topor...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > In my case, the selection of the servlet container has never been a hard > > requirement. I mean, some customers provide us a virtual machine > configured > > with java/tomcat , others have a tomcat installed and want to share it > with > > solr, others prefer jetty because their sysadmins are used to configure > > it... At least in the projects I've been working in, the selection of > the > > servlet engine has not been a key factor in the project success. > > > > Regards. > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Andre Bois-Crettez > > <andre.b...@kelkoo.com>wrote: > > > > > We are using Solr running on Tomcat. > > > > > > I think the top reasons for us are : > > > - we already have nagios monitoring plugins for tomcat that trace > > > queries ok/error, http codes / response time etc in access logs, number > > > of threads, jvm memory usage etc > > > - start, stop, watchdogs, logs : we also use our standard tools for > that > > > - what about security filters ? Is that possible with jetty ? > > > > > > André > > > > > > > > > On 11/12/2013 04:54 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > > > > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I keep seeing here and on Stack Overflow people trying to deploy Solr > to > > >> Tomcat. We don't usually ask why, just help when where we can. > > >> > > >> But the question happens often enough that I am curious. What is the > > >> actual > > >> business case. Is that because Tomcat is well known? Is it because > other > > >> apps are running under Tomcat and it is ops' requirement? Is it > because > > >> Tomcat gives something - to Solr - that Jetty does not? > > >> > > >> It might be useful to know. Especially, since Solr team is considering > > >> making the server part into a black box component. What use cases will > > >> that > > >> break? > > >> > > >> So, if somebody runs Solr under Tomcat (or needed to and gave up), > let's > > >> use this thread to collect this knowledge. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Alex. > > >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > > >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch > > >> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all > at > > >> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD > > book) > > >> > > >> -- > > >> André Bois-Crettez > > >> > > >> Software Architect > > >> Search Developer > > >> http://www.kelkoo.com/ > > >> > > > > > > Kelkoo SAS > > > Société par Actions Simplifiée > > > Au capital de € 4.168.964,30 > > > Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris > > > 425 093 069 RCS Paris > > > > > > Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à > > > l'attention exclusive de leurs destinataires. Si vous n'êtes pas le > > > destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire et d'en avertir > > > l'expéditeur. > > > > > > -- Doug Turnbull Search & Big Data Architect OpenSource Connections <http://o19s.com>
