You are right on that one. Collection is the new term. Which is why basic example is "collection1". Core is the physical representation and it gets a bit confusing at that level with shards and all that. The documentation is in a transition.
Regards, Alex. Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Stavros Delisavas <stav...@delisavas.de> wrote: > I didn't know that the "core"-term is associated with this use case. I > expected it to be some technical feature that allows to run more > solr-instances for better multithread-cpu-usage. For example to activate > two solr-cores when two cpu-cores are available on the server. > > So in general, I have the feeling that the term "core" is somewhat > confusing for solr-beginners like me. > > > > Am 23.01.2014 09:54, schrieb Alexandre Rafalovitch: >> Which is why it is curious that you did not find it. Looking back at >> it now, do you have a suggestion of what could be improved to insure >> people find this easier in the future? >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch >> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all >> at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD >> book) >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Stavros Delisavas <stav...@delisavas.de> >> wrote: >>> Thanks for the fast responses. Looks like exactly what I was looking for! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 23.01.2014 09:46, schrieb Furkan KAMACI: >>>> Hi; >>>> >>>> Firstly you should read here and learn the terminology of Solr: >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTerminology >>>> >>>> Thanks; >>>> Furkan KAMACI >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014/1/23 Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> If you are not worried about them stepping on each other's toes >>>>> (performance, disk space, etc), just create multiple collections. >>>>> There are examples of that in standard distribution (e.g. badly named >>>>> example/multicore). >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Alex. >>>>> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ >>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch >>>>> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all >>>>> at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD >>>>> book) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stavros Delisavas <stav...@delisavas.de> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Dear Solr-Experts, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am using Solr for my current web-application on my server successfully. >>>>>> Now I would like to use it in my second web-application that is hosted >>>>>> on the same server. Is it possible in any way to create two independent >>>>>> instances/databases in Solr? I know that I could create another set of >>>>>> fields with alternated field names, but I would prefer to be independent >>>>>> on my field naming for all my projects. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also I would like to be able to have one state of my development version >>>>>> and one state of my production version on my server so that I can do >>>>>> tests on my development-state without interference on my >>>>> production-version. >>>>>> What is the best-practice to achieve this or how can this be done in >>>>>> general? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have searched google but could not get any usefull results because I >>>>>> don't even know what terms to search for with solr. >>>>>> A minimal-example would be most helpfull. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot! >>>>>> >>>>>> Stavros >
