Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok... The first milestone date has passed, and no one has even commented > on this mail. So let's try it this way ... Unless I hear otherwise > by 12am EST, 3/13/2004 ... This will be the release schedule for 3.0.0. > It gets us a release in approx 8 weeks and is considered mildly agressive.
-1 This is not the way we should be planning a major release (based on a date) and the schedule is much too early for us to finalize our 3.0 feature set. We should determine which features and bug fixes are minimally desired for 3.0 and base our planning around that. For example, I think we must solidify the test types (body, raw, etc.) before we can release 3.0. Let's talk about features and bugs and *then* schedule, not the other way around. I'm willing to put together the list of bugs (and stuff not in bugs yet, but covered on -dev) that I think are minimally needed by the end of the weekend. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ and open source consulting
