On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:35:24PM -0800, Dan Quinlan wrote: > -1 That's 2 +1s and 1 -1 so far (note: -1 does not veto here per the apache voting rules), not counting myself.
> This is not the way we should be planning a major release (based on a
> date) and the schedule is much too early for us to finalize our 3.0
> feature set.
Well, we need a guideline or else we'll keep developing for eternity.
> We should determine which features and bug fixes are minimally desired
> for 3.0 and base our planning around that. For example, I think we must
> solidify the test types (body, raw, etc.) before we can release 3.0.
There's nothing stopping that -- in fact that's what the first part
of the schedule does! Figure out what we want and get the tickets
sorted accordingly. Then get as many of those done as possible in the
given time frame. We can then "play by ear" what happens if there are
still large items left.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I didn't know Allman was a stand-up comedian ..."
- Theo about laughter from sendmail tutorial
pgpIXLPG08cXO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
