http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-24 16:38 ------- Subject: Re: [review] Rewrite masses/ (in perl) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> IMO, "check" is too generic. it's scanning. > >Well, actually it is running check(). That's where I figured the name >came from actually. :) So it becomes a semantics issue really imo. true -- although we were talking a while back about renaming that too (although that's kind of fallen off the list as a priority). Also, a command-line script has a higher "API visibility level" than an internal method name, if you get me... - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAsodlQTcbUG5Y7woRAqEZAJ9ekYOW+JuvWWcOmy3oQpVWEDneZQCdFNZn 9EDuQfF16mvMB+aIPPZ+Tz4= =w/df -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
