http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-24 17:47 ------- Re: mboxget vs extract-message-from-mbox: I kinda merged the two scripts, so the extract-message-from-mbox as shown in the patch should be pretty much like the current mboxget + it has the ability to read mass-check logs Re: adding sa- prefix: I'm relatively indifferent on this. It's probably a good idea, although I was originally planning on having them put into /usr/share/spamassassin-tools rather than /usr/bin to avoid cluttering the namespace. Renaming them makes them more accessible. So I'll vote for renaming (and only renaming the ones that are going to be distributed). I'm not currently distributing the scripts in tools, although I may wish to now (we should probably rename them then) Re: mass-check vs mass-scan: I like the ring to mass-check better, but mass-scan is probably more logical. Re: FP/FN numbers: I'm not sure what you're talking about. btw fp-fn-statistics is essentially what logs-to-c --count used to be. Re: MSR: I agree there should be a better name, but I'm not sure this is it. But in the absence of a better suggestion.... Someone want to give me another +1 so I can commit what I've got and we can worry about the rest later, or do you feel you want to see another patch? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
