http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3331
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-13 12:42 ------- I agree for not putting this in to 3.0. An addon to dump tokens and generate a dictionary is always an option as long as the original source of the email exists. That should take care of anyone who wants to research the Bayes stuff. The information is not lost just because it is not stored in the database as long as there is the corpus that it came from, and anyone researching Bayes would need to keep the corpus anyway. I still think that the results of this attempt may point to some optimization that we can get when someone has the time to pursue it. Michael referred to the "spaghetti code" in DBM.pm as being in the way of removing parameters being passed down through many levels and having to check them in many places. Perhaps this points to benefits from cleaning that up. Of course this would be for some version past 3.0. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
