On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:40:46PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 17:22:29 -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > > On my system, -lndbm is not required, it seems. I think it has to do with > > MakeMaker choosing what is needed (incorrectly?). However, libndbm.so is > > listed as belonging to libc6-dev on potato, on packages.d.o. > > Thanks a lot for your help. I do have libc6-dev installed, but a: > > dpkg -L libc6-dev| grep ndbm > > gives only: > > /usr/include/db1/ndbm.h > > a find for libndbm.so shows nothing on the system. > > Am I right in interpreting your answer '-lndbm is not required' that I > can modify the Makefile so it does not inculde that particular option > and build again? I am a little unsure in this field, have never coded a > line in my life... >
There's only one way to find out. My system requires: "-lgdbm -ldb -ldl -lm -lc -lcrypt". Are you sure about libndbm.so not being in libc6-dev? packages.debian.org says it definitely is. What version and arch are you using? -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk