On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:40:46PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 17:22:29 -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> 
> > On my system, -lndbm is not required, it seems. I think it has to do with
> > MakeMaker choosing what is needed (incorrectly?). However, libndbm.so is
> > listed as belonging to libc6-dev on potato, on packages.d.o.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your help. I do have libc6-dev installed, but a:
> 
>   dpkg -L libc6-dev| grep ndbm
> 
> gives only:
> 
>   /usr/include/db1/ndbm.h
> 
> a find for libndbm.so shows nothing on the system.
> 
> Am I right in interpreting your answer '-lndbm is not required' that I
> can modify the Makefile so it does not inculde that particular option
> and build again? I am a little unsure in this field, have never coded a
> line in my life...
> 

There's only one way to find out.  My system requires: "-lgdbm -ldb -ldl -lm
-lc -lcrypt".

Are you sure about libndbm.so not being in libc6-dev? packages.debian.org
says it definitely is.  What version and arch are you using?

-- 
Duncan Findlay

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to