At 12:30 AM 12/4/03 -0500, Richard Bewley wrote:
So, do I still need the 'bl', 'bl.blueshore.net'.'?  Or, can I just leave
that out?

Well, you DEFINITELY need the bl.blueshore.net.. otherwise how would SA know what blacklist to query?


The 'bl' part can be more-or-less any unique string. It's used to "store" the result of one RBL check, so that later sub-checks can examine individual parts of the answer. (Some RBL's are actually multiple lists in one, and the IP address that you get after a lookup indicates which lists were matched. SORBS works this way. 127.0.0.2 is one list, 127.0.0.4 is a different one, etc..)

Here's my suggestion:

header RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL            eval:check_rbl ('blue','bl.blueshore.net.')
describe RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL          Listed by bl.blueshore.net
tflags RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL            net
score RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL             5.0

Technicaly I don't think the tflags line is needed here, but it won't hurt anything... AFAIK it's just to control how the GA handles assigning scores when the developers do a GA run.





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey.
Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this
five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate.
http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=8
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to