On January 15, 2004 01:15 pm, Charles Gregory wrote: > And if someone STEALS your car, the person who stole it is responsible, > even if you are unaware of the theft. With insurane being compulsory, in > some places the laws have been changed so that the owner's insurance > covers all damages regardless of circumstance, but that is an artifical > situation created by the nature of insurance, not the actual > responsibility for owning the car. > > In any event, your analogy is flawed. To match the conditions which you > think someone should be sued for, that car would have to be used in the > commission of a bank robbery, and then by your logic the owner of the car > would be held responsible for all the money stolen?
Here's another analogy, I leave my legally owned and licensed firearm in plain view in the fore mentioned car. Robbers then proceed to steal my big ass gun and rob a bank ... well, you see where this is headed. Pedro -- When in doubt, do what the President does -- guess. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
