I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range. Nothing more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing dynamic, but then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by mailservers and then it actually made sense. It doesn't make sense the way SA uses it. :)

I'm aware it's not a bug or anything, but it can cause problems when SA uses the lists in other ways then they were intended to.

Anders,

Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:22 PM 1/18/04 +0100, PieterB wrote:
>
However, listing in a single RBL really shouldn't cause you any significant problems communicating with people who use SA. The threshold is 5.0 and for example, the person you linked to was complaining about RCVD_IN_SORBS.

SORBS is a very low collateral damage list. The person posting is likely listed because his/her source IP is a zombie (ie: stolen or transferred in an illegal manner) or it's a got an open proxy on it. If it's got an open proxy, they can fix it and submit the IP for retesting..

if the IP address is stolen and listed in the zombie block, they should be VERY wary of their ISP. They've obviously been buying IP blocks on the grey/black market.


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to