On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 01:10:26PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi All > > > > For the following spam why am I getting 2.3? This is my report > > Dude, are you going to report every single missed spam you get? Missed
My intention was not to report an spam. Rather if I can get some help help to detect spam like that. Totally different intention that how you are labelling it I only expect an help on how to detect spam like that, or why my setup did not detect that spam and if there is any suggestion out here in the mailing list. Are you saying I am NOT suppose to ask for help by showing a sample spam that I missed to detect? Is there another mailing list where I can get help related to spams that my SA slipped to detect? If yes I would happily redirect of emails of that nature to that list Hope I made my intention clear. You replied twice to my email to made your point. No wonder there are 920 msgs just from you stored now in the internet :-) Thanks anyway > spam happens, it's not a bug. The only way to catch all spam is to > send everything, ham and spam, to /dev/null. > > Please read the FAQ on the wiki: > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DoYouWantMySpam > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Quinlan > http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu There's no place like 127.0.0.1
