On Tuesday 03 August 2004 15:14, Scot L. Harris might have typed: > On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 09:59, Duncan Hill wrote:
> > Yep, and that's one reason I greylist :) Not much actually reaches my > > greylisting db due to other restrictions in place, but it does work > > effectively. > > And using a greylisting delay of only a few minutes currently eliminates > 98 to 99% of the spam out there. Of course in this case a longer delay > would be needed to let the surbl lists update with new spam. And > if/when the spammers try to get around it the combination of greylisting > and using spamassassin with black lists will take care of the problem. Yes. I've had to whitelist my spamtraps ahead of all of my protections due to the spamtraps not getting spam. Sort of defeats the purpose of a spam trap. Speaking of, is there a way to make maildrop forward a mail in the appropriate format for spamcop?
