On Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 6:32:59 AM, Duncan Hill wrote: > On Tuesday 03 August 2004 13:50, Asif Iqbal might have typed:
>> Yes, I am. And thats what I exactly suspected is that my spamcop_uri is >> not working. Not sure why. Is there a quick way to check where it is >> failing ? >> >> > http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html > It took about 1/2 an hour after Jeff posted that it was in WS before the > local > DNS managed to find a surbl.org DNS that had the record: > 12:56:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~>> dig bigpharmaworld.us.ws.surbl.org > No answer. > 13:18:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~>> dig bigpharmaworld.us.ws.surbl.org > bigpharmaworld.us.ws.surbl.org. 5400 IN A 127.0.0.2 > Feed the same message through SA again and see if WS catches it. Yes, we're looking at lowering the TTLs across the board on all SURBLs now. I'm in a conversation on the rbldnsd list about negative and positive caching, some effects on name server load, etc. It's quite interesting if somewhat esoteric. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
