On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Duncan Hill wrote: > On Tuesday 03 August 2004 13:50, Asif Iqbal might have typed: > > > Yes, I am. And thats what I exactly suspected is that my spamcop_uri is > > not working. Not sure why. Is there a quick way to check where it is > > failing ? > > > > > http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html > > It took about 1/2 an hour after Jeff posted that it was in WS before the > local > DNS managed to find a surbl.org DNS that had the record:
You are right.. Now it thinks it is an spam Content analysis details: (8.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RATWR10_MESSID Message-ID has ratware pattern (HEXHEX.HEXHEX@) 1.7 SARE_RECV_IP_218079 Spam passed through possible spammer relay or source 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.9 BAYES_10 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 10 to 20% [score: 0.1115] 0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML 4.0 OB_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in ob.surbl.org [www.bigpharmaworld.us is blacklisted in URI RBL] [at ob.surbl.org] 3.0 WS_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist [www.bigpharmaworld.us is blacklisted in URI RBL] [at ws.surbl.org] > > 12:56:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~> dig bigpharmaworld.us.ws.surbl.org > No answer. > > 13:18:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~> dig bigpharmaworld.us.ws.surbl.org > bigpharmaworld.us.ws.surbl.org. 5400 IN A 127.0.0.2 > > Feed the same message through SA again and see if WS catches it. -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu There's no place like 127.0.0.1
