Yes, I remember this now. Even though it was a re-parse, at least the info
was still there. Now there is no reference anywhere that I can find.
--
Sue Morton
"Jos� Lamas R�os" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9cc8vo$25b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9cc8vo$25b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 9c9g75$rot$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9c9g75$rot$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> Back in the past, SC used to add to those headers something like:
>
> Found link: http://www.example.com/gimmeyourmoney
> Found link: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When you looked at the main tracking URL those found items had links to
> their respective trackings, as follows:
>
> http://spamcop.net/sc?track=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.com%2Fgimmeyourmoney,
> and
> http://spamcop.net/sc?track=spammer%40example.com
>
> However, as with any tracking URL, they are not actually the result of the
> original parse, just a request for SC to parse that item again.
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
