It is still a big perl script :-) We've not had any issues with memory/cpu with it but I expect our servers aren't as busy as others. Faris.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamdyke-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Mueller > Sent: 16 May 2008 16:18 > To: spamdyke users > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] yet another wishlist... :-) > > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 14:31 +0100, Faris Raouf wrote: > > Forgive me if I'm missing something here, but qmail-scanner already > does > > spamassassin and AV checking, and can be configured to reject (as > opposed to > > drop) any emails that fall outside of admin/user set parameters. > > I used q-s in the past, but had to drop it because of memory/cpu-use > issues... As far as I remember it was an huge perl script started on > every incoming mail: is it still the case? (better would be something > like spamd + spamc). > > But I guess it's still a fine solution for low-trafic servers :) > regards, > Olivier > > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
