FWIW, the QMail-Toaster project is planning to maintain the qmail code base on GitHub in the near future, as well as associated QMT packages. I'm hoping that a few enhancements in the area of submission throttling will be included at some point. If you'd like to participate, please hop on over to the qmailtoaster-devel list (mailto:qmailtoaster-de...@qmailtoaster.com).
-- -Eric 'shubes' On 07/06/2012 08:34 AM, Mark Frater wrote: > Hi Mike, > > That is too much overhead just to be able to use Postfix. > > To be honest one of the biggest factors for me wanting to move to Postfix > over Qmail is the fact that Postfix allows sender-restrictions... such as > rejecting MAIL FROM to auth login mismatch as well as sender-verification. > > Would be pretty cool if spamdyke could do this! > > Kind Regards, > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org > [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Michael J. Colvin > Sent: 06 July 2012 05:14 PM > To: 'spamdyke users' > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke and Postfix > > Use Spamdyke/Qmail as a frontend and pass the filtered mail on to a Postfix > server if you want to use it for your customer facing stuff... Then you get > both. You can also use virtual servers as the Spamdyke/Qmail "frontend". > Remove SpamAssassin from the mix, and any old server should suffice as a > "Filtering" server. > > Mike > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org [mailto:spamdyke-users- >> boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Gary Gendel >> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 7:30 AM >> To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke and Postfix >> >> On 7/6/12 10:20 AM, Mark Frater wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Has there been any further developments / discussions in getting >>> Spamdyke to run as a daemon or similar method in order to get it to >>> work with other MTA's such as Postfix? >>> >>> Qmail is seriously long in the tooth and no longer maintained and >>> for this reason more and more admins (including myself) are moving >>> away from it - or want to. >>> >>> I would like to move to Postfix but I'm a loyal Spamdyke fan and as >>> such the only thing holding me back is the fact that Spamdyke won't >> work! >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> Mark >>> >>> >> I'm not sure why you say that Qmail is "long in the tooth" since an >> unpatched Qmail with spamdyke front end is pretty much state-of-the- >> art. The fact that Qmail it is so lightweight and does exactly what >> is needed in an efficient and data-safe manner makes a lot of sense. >> >> That said, I wouldn't mind a Postfix/spamdyke solution but that would >> take a significant effort as spamdyke does things the Qmail way (uses >> environment variables to pass information, etc.) >> >> Gary >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spamdyke-users mailing list >> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
